POPPS ‘A’ (home) A: Terry Allington B: Peter McMullen C: Derek Greenwood
Tradesmen 2 (away) X: Sam Drake Y: Mathew Knapton Z: Alex ?
Apocalyptic is a BIG word – eleven letters, with probably as many meanings and as many people with suggestions for its appropriate use. To Popps ‘A’, this final match of the season seemed to sit appropriately under this heading, in a small yet significant way.
By the nature of the make-up of their team, Tradesmen 2 will always present a meaningful and sharp-eyed challenge to any team in League 3. In our first encounter with them this season, in November, we, amazingly, saw them off with an extraordinarily controlled performance, leaving them stamping, shouting and gesticulating in despair, as they failed to dip under our radar. It was, in fact, one of our most committed victories of the season, framed with a modest, yet tasty, cocktail of unexpected shots and strategies. This time, however, we knew that we were there to be hunted down, hounded out into the open and picked over with a fine toothcomb.
With Chie still away on family duty in Japan, the team was already weakened, with Peter needing to renovate his body rather than his house and Derek his usual lamed and inconsistent self. We watched the eager, agitated and ‘keen to get on with it’ demeanour of Tradesmen 2 as they prepared to get down to work. Conscientious they certainly were, not the sort of Tradesmen who don’t turn up on the day, arriving later with a litany of unbelievable excuses – take note, Peter, this WAS commitment!
In comparison, we ALL looked a bit weary, felt a bit weary and, ultimately played a bit weary!
A nervy start from Terry against Sam, saw him complete two games successfully, if lengthily. However, with past long nights in mind, game 3 saw the imposition of the experdite rule. A slightly strange set of rules, for us at least, but they were certainly the key to Sam’s revival in this set. The incentive seemed suddenly there to exploit opportunities that barely seemed to be apparent. He pulled himself back into the set, leaving a deciding fifth set to ebb towards him and away from Terry. In a rather untidy set, Peter allowed Mathew to get an early handle on his game and succumbed, painfully, to a three game defeat. Derek took on Alex with enthusiasm and commitment but simply did not possess the mobility to challenge meaningfully. Peter too the first game of Alex, but the felt the fighting quality of this determined young man to slide sadly to a four game defeat. In an absorbing contest of, fortunately, manageable length, Terry eventually imposed his will upon the determined Alex, over five games. Derek enjoyed his best set of the night against Mathew, taking the third game after narrowly losing the first two: with Derek tiring, Mathew comfortably took the fourth to win the set. Peter turned the exhausted Alex in a lively four-game set, probably the best of the night. After a close first game, Sam pushed his way passed Derek over three games. Terry endured a tight first game against Mathew before pushing him firmly out of the way in the next two games.
So, a frustrating and disappointing evening for us, particularly for Terry. The introduction (some would say inevitable introduction, some would say necessary introduction) of ‘the experdite rule’ in order to sway Terry’s un-ending marathon approach to curbing the determined resistance of others, did seem to hold a whiff of Bernie Ecclestone’s fantasy Formula 1 idea, with his suggestion of random, God-like rain! Who the God of table-tennis is we’re not entirely sure! Somehow, this strange intrusion on a table-tennis match did seem to have a misty hint of that hideously lethal political expedient, ‘extraordinary rendition’, about it: in fact, for Popps ‘A’, it will, from now on, probably be referred to as ‘extraordinary experdition’!
Well done, team, all of you, for doing your best: thanks too to Tradesmen 2 for providing us with some great table-tennis – we wish you well!
A v X: 11-7/11-8/9-11/7-11/2-11 (A)
B v Y: 7-11/5-11/7-11 (A)
C v Z: 6-11/4-11/7-11 (A)
B v X: 11-4/7-11/7-11/7-11 (A)
A v Z 11-4/7-11/11-5/8-11/11-8 (H)
C v Y: 9=11/10-12/11-9/4-11 (A)
B v Z: 7-11/11-5/11-5/11-8 (H)
C v X: 9-11/5-11/5-11 (A)
A v Y: 12-14/11-4/11-3 (H)