Popps A 9 Northowram MPM 0

Faint hopes of promotion maintained with another good 9-0 win.

Terry Allington, Derek Greenwood and Peter McMullen all played their part in this match which keeps our chances still alive (Till next week when we grapple with the hungry Tigers once again !! )

Popps A 9 O.T.Hounds 0

Popps A kept their faint hopes of promotion alive with this result, not dropping a game in the whole match.

This was a creditable performance and shows the continuing improvement of Popps; we just managed a 5-4 victory in the prevous encounter.

John Taylor, Terry Allington and Peter McMullen all scored a max. 3 wins.
Our opponents, Derek Williamson, John Coneron and Rose Tipton were all gracious in defeat but would all do much better if they had our coaching and practise. Also if they did not have to rush their games to get home to feed the dog/cat/goldfish etc. !!!

Lions are one of the contenders for winning the division this year so POPPs B expected a tough night and so it turned out to be. Terry W, John M and Alan W of POPPs took on Ben Speak, John Tallis and Hannah Kendal and generally gave a good account of themselves with 4 sets going to 5 games. The match took rather longer than usual partly because of the flip chart scoring system (it is rumoured Alan hid the electronic scoring consuls because of a children’s event earlier in the day) and partly because Lions team members kept disappearing to other tables to play in between their games.

Terry and John got us off to a speedy and efficient start (in terms of time keeping that is) by losing the first two sets 0 – 3. Terry made too many mistakes against Ben due to having difficulty returning serve safely and resorting in the end to aggressive returns and hoping for the best. This kept him in touch but never close enough to fluke a game. John suffered a similar fate against John Tallis although there was some evidence that he was warming to the task toward the end.

Then, as is now customary, Alan produced the set of the night against Hannah. As is usual in Alan’s 5 game sets, he lost the first one – always behind by a couple of points and never catching up. He won the second 11 – 8 after being behind but this time steadying his returns and raising his concentration and consistency. Backing a bit further away from the table he gave himself more room for his heavily chopped returns forcing Hannah to hit a bit harder and make a few more errors. The 3rd game went to Hannah fairly easily 7 – 11, a little surprising as this was mainly due to Alan making more errors than he normally does at this stage of the game. However, he refocused for the 4th game from 8 – 10 down to win 12 – 10. This was aided by an outrageous net shot that teetered on the net cord holding the outcome of the match in the balance. It trickled down on Hannah’s side of the net and kept Alan in the game to go on and win. If it had fallen Alan’s side the set would have gone to Hannah by 3 games to 1.  The final game went to Alan fairly comfortably in the end 11 – 9, always in front and never caught. Hannah hit quite a few returns long in this game probably because Alan was varying his chopped returns with an occasional floated return. These looked pretty much the same as his chopped returns but with almost no backspin.

In his second set against Ben John played some of his best table tennis so far this season, taking him to 5 games. His block returns of Ben’s top spin drives were fast and accurate, and his selection of back and forehand attacking shots was spot on.  After losing the first game 8 – 11, John won the next two long hard games 12 – 10 and 13 – 11. The intensity and duration of the games were beginning to take their toll however. Before the 4th game, to every one’s horror, John appeared to be taking his top off. In the event he was just mopping his forehead with it but the Lions were very near to conceding the match and beating a hasty retreat. Once order had been restored John lost the 4th game 9 – 11 and, pretty well knackered, lost the 5th game quite quickly 5 – 11.

We will pass quickly over Terry’s speedy defeat by Hannah 0 – 3. It was only when he was 2 games down he realised he had been playing with someone elses bat. Sadly, reverting to his own bat made not a jot of difference.

The next two sets went to 5 games before POPPs lost them both. Alan came up against John Tallis for another hard fought set. After (as usual) losing the first game 11 – 13, he settled down to minimising John’s attacking opportunities. This led to some rather over ambitious and frustrated big hits from John with sufficient of them missing to give Alan the next 2 games 12- 10 and 11 – 7.  John settled in the 4th game to take it 11- 9 so all was on the last. Alan was 5 – 3 up at the change round but then seemed to change his game. Errors crept into the solid defensive shots leading him to go for rather more winners than usual and the game drifted away from him losing 8 – 11 and the set 2 games to 3.

John then took on Hannah and won the first game 11 – 3. No doubt feeling guilty about so heartlessly abusing a young woman, he promptly lost the next game 3 – 11 to even things up. Honour satisfied, he soon got back into the groove and won the 3rd game 11 – 9. By now John was leaning on the table between points. Due no doubt in part to John’s tiredness Hannah went on to win the next 2 games 5 – 11, 3 – 11 and the set 3 – 2.

All that remaind was for Alan to play Ben and Terry to play John Tallis. Ben played his best table tennis of the evening and beat Alan 8 – 11, 8 – 11, 9 – 11. As Alan said, Ben was just too good on the day. Terry lost to John 8 – 11, 3 – 11 and 7 – 11 having particular difficulty in returning heavy side spin serves.

It was a long hard night played in good spirit. POPPs came away feeling they had acquitted themselves well, givne our psoition near to the bottom of the division, and made the Lions team work to win some of the games and sets at least.

March 10, 2010

From past experience, we knew this would be a difficult fixture, but we could only do our best. Like John Terry, we would be playing away, although the pleasures would only involve ball and bat. Our opponents would have the advantage of knowing the table well and would know their way to the venue, always a tricky assignment for city dwellers. Most of the snow had gone as we approached this attractive village, fighting our way through unruly herds of cows, sheep all over the place and crowds of drunken locals outside the pub munching Yorkshire pudding.

John Mitchell commenced against Derek Williamson, who briefly revealed a tanned, honed torso as he removed his track suit top. He started well as Derek adjusted to his serve, but Derek recovered well to take G1 11-9. John started talking to himself, always a sign of frustration, as more of Derek’s back hand smashes worked, taking him to 11- 4. John pulled himself together in G3, with some effective fore hand smashes, to win 11-5. At various amusing moments, Sue’s deep, slightly croaky laugh rang out, like a solitary crow on a hillside. G4 started evenly, but Derek played with care, and with the help of one fluke, won 11-5, to take the set.

Robin couldn’t cope with Don Cameron’s tricky spin serve and returned a large number into the net. He achieved some good back hand returns, but lost G1 11-6. G2 was a little closer, but Don edged to 11- 8. G3 had some exciting rallies, but the result was around the same at 11-6.

By this time, Terry had arrived after another Magical Mystery Tour of the Pennines. He needed to get warmed up quickly, so a massage was arranged with a local 25 stone milk maid, Hortense. In the warm up, a stray shot from Terry nearly turned your correspondent into the Lord Nelson of TT writers. After a tentative start, Sue Allen surged to an 11-5 win. Wearing what looked like cheap moccasins from Asda, she used her spin serve to cause Terry some problems and executed a high proportion of successful smashes to win G2 11-5. In what turned out to be the final game, things were much closer, Terry kept in touch with his usual mixture of breathtaking winners and gut-wrenching failed smashes. Sue performed a spectacularly bad serve and let out a huge roar of disapproval. It reached 11-11, but Sue produced a couple of good shots to win 13-11.

Exhorting himself to wake up, John started with more confidence against Don, using Billy Cotton’s old catch phrase, ‘Wakey, Wakey’, and moved to win G1 11-9, after Don missed the table with a crucial serve. John was now dealing with Don’s serve, and although he missed a couple of smashes, John won G2 11-7. Don fought back well in G3, steadying his game down and executing some effective forehand smashes. John started talking to himself as Don won 11-4. It seemed to work, as did more shouting as John tied up the set 11-6.

Robin then took on Sue who won G1 11-8 with some accurate returns. Robin replied to win 11-9 after some great shots, but in the remaining games could not keep the ball away from Sue’s effective forehand and she won them 11-8 & 11-7. There were some fast encounters, but Sue was too accurate overall.

I couldn’t help but notice that John seemed to be using a grotty old towel he could have stolen from a rabid tramp, but I digress. By this time, Terry and Derek were squaring up for what turned out to be a well fought encounter. Terry’s back hand flick was starting to work, but not all the time and Derek won G1 11-5. Terry smashed well in G2 and Derek was on the wrong end of a couple of flukes which dented his concentration. Terry was having regular drinks of what could have been holy water and won G2 11-6. By this time, your TT correspondent had noticed that Derek played mainly back hand with a strange oriental grip. It worked quite well, but not quite well enough and in G3, Terry edged to 12-10. Derek’s BH deteriorated in G4, while Terry stared to improve the success of his attacks. Derek told himself to wake up, but to no avail and Terry won 11-9, to take the set 3-1.

Sue started well against John, but he fought back to level at 5-5. At this stage John described his game as ‘Tripe’. Sue squealed, John howled and the game eventually went to Sue at 16-14. The match confirmed how effective TT would be on Digital Radio. John surged to 11-6 in G2 helped by some good returns (his) and some bad serves (hers). G3 started with a powerful shriek from John as he continued to play to her strong forehand and she prevailed at 11-6. In G4, we heard Sue crying out ‘Aah!’, while John admonished himself with ‘Nasty!’ It was like hearing two demented hyenas. Though winning 11-9, John denounced his performance with ‘John, you stood there like a prune!’ Sue started well in the decider, but again John fought back to get level. At 8-8, John was beginning to breathe heavily like a veteran film actor in a dimly lit love scene and ran out of steam for Sue to win 11-8 and the set.

The match had been lost by the time Terry met Don, but both continued to play competitive TT. Terry’s smashes started to work as he won G1 11-9. He further went for his shots in G2, but Don also won some good forehand smashes. However, Terry moved to 11-6. By this time, Terry was glugging water every couple of shots, like a marathon runner and Don was able to get back a game, 11-9. In G4, Don missed some smashes while Terry’s percentage improved and he won 11-7. Don had the consolation of winning the best dressed player award, with his expensive trainers, neat blue track suit, matching blue tank top, the outfit completed with an attractive blue and red bat. They are all using them these days.

Finally, Derek beat Robin 11-6, 11-4 and 11-4 using his trademark back hand and a very strange looking serve as he crouched almost below the table to impart some fiendish spin which bamboozled your Team Sec.

As usual, the match was played with good humour and sportsmanship as successful shots were applauded. The team then sped back to civilisation, having lost 3-6.

8th March 2010. Popps A Pipped by Artful Hares

Having been told their “No.1″ , Neil Coneron had to go home early to feed the cat (or was it the wife?) we agreed to let him play his sets early.

With PeterMc beating Neil, Alan Wood doing extremely well in beating No 2 Phil Ward in a hard fought 5 setter, and Terry Allington beating both of them, Popps raced into a 4-2 lead. However we then found that we had been lulled into a false sense of security.

They brought on their resident professional, Clive Edens, who quickly disposed of Peter and Alan. Even then he nearly stumbled against our resident brick wall, Terry, who returned smash after smash from Clive, just loosing out in the 4th after some brilliant rallies.
With their Nos 1 & 2 each winning a set this gave them their 5-4 victory.

Still, this was more improvement from the Popps, having lost the first half fixture at home 7-2.

Oakland Raiders 348 v. Popps A 258

We expected Oakland Raiders, being favorites for promotion to the 1st Division, would hammer us.

So Peter started the proceedings and gave a creditable performance (he said) narrowly loosing the 2nd game (2 games to 21), total score 31-42.
The irrepressible Terry A then played Dave Whiteley and won the 2nd and total score 40-33. A great performance.

Derek G then lost against Robert Wright 16-42.

Peter’s turn again, against DW but could not cope with Dave’s spin service and was well beaten 19-42.

Derek, not on top form, then lost to SH 16-42. But Terry again turned the match around by winning his second game against RW 21-12 and achieved set score of 41-33, aother tremendous achievement.

Derek pulled himself together in his 3rd set and scored 20-42 against DW.
Peter also rallied himself against RW winning the 2nd game and achieving a 35-40 score.

Leaving the best to last Terry then had a wonderful 2 game win against Steve Horrocks, total score a magnificent 42-32 victory.

Result: Popps A 258 Oakland Raiders 348 but with our Handicap allowance of 171, this meant we won by 81 points and now go into the Quarter Finals. (Or should we quit whilst ahead ?)

PM PS Maybe in future we could save on expenses by sending Terry in on his own !

Old Town Hares are currently Division leaders so POPPs B (third from bottom currently) framed themselves to save face and attempt at least to win some games. So the formidable Hares trio of Simon, Phil and Neil faced the rather less than formidable POPPs B team of Alan W, Terry W and John M. However, Alan turned out to be the star of the evening winning all 3 of his sets in dramatic style. In his first set against Simon the writing seemed to be on the wall from the off with Alan losing the first game rapidly 4 – 11 having trouble with Simon’s serve and brisk returns. In the second game his service return improved a little and managed to get into some longer rallies. Simon played with more abandon in this game, probably because he won the first so easily, and began to miss some of his more aggressive shots. This gave Alan the opportunity to pull back an early deficit and take the game to 10 all. Simon served for the set on 3 occasions but Alan returned and through dogged defence survived and served out to win the game 15 – 13. With this setback Simon returned to his rather more circumspect style of the first game and had little difficulty winning the 3rd game. Alan continued to improve his service return but lost out on the long defensive rallies as Simon just kept pushing the ball back and waiting for mistakes. At this point it looked as if Simon had re-established his superiority after a temporary lapse in the second game and was well on his way to victory. Oh ye of little faith! Alan would have none of this and, having adapted his game to deal with Simon’s difficult serves, now dug in to improve his accuracy and reliability in the long pushing rallies. He did this to such good effect that he ran out the winner of the remaining 2 games 11- 7 and 11 – 5, and so winning the set 3 games to 2.

Terry’s first set, against Phil, was altogether more predicable and very much quicker with very few rallies of more than 4 strokes. Of the three Hare’s players Phil probably had the trickiest serve of all. He hardly won any points against Phil’s serve with his returns flying off the sides of the table to left or right or, to break the monotony, occasionally into the net. If and when a rally got going, usually on Terry’s serve, a few points were salvaged but the final game scores were 8 – 11, 6 – 11, 1 -11, evidence of Phil’s domination and Terry’s frustration and lack of patience.

John’s first match was against Neil. The first game showed some promise with John getting in some very good backhand drives but, like Terry before, missing too many forehand ‘winners’. He also tended to be the first to make a mistake in the longer pushing rallies. However, despite losing 7 – 11, John was settling in, finding his range and looked like he was beginning to raise his game. This was confirmed in the second game which remained close throughout with John winning 12 – 10. This may have taken it out of the old war horse though and with his forehand continuing to let him down and Neil prolonging the rallies as much as possible, the next 2 games were both lost 5 – 11. losing the set 1 game to 3.

Terry’s second set was against Simon who, chastened by his 5 game loss to Alan, started with determination and confidence. His confidence  was undoubtedly boosted by Terry’s previous less than impressive showing. And, as contenders for the Division champions in a very tight competition, every game lost could be crucial in the final reckoning. Simon made no mistake and won 7 -11, 1 -11 and 8 -11. Terry played his usual occasional dramatic backhand and forehand winners, one crashing backhand smash made from 3 feet to the side of the table with the ball at shoulder height. It could have gone anywhere and normally it would have. Fortunately on this occasion it hit the right end of the right table.

Alan’s second set against Neil was the highlight of the evening. To cut a long story short Alan won 3 games to 2 but not before losing the first two games 5 -11 and 9 -11. The key lesson to be taken from watching Alan is that he learns from the early stages of a match, sharpens up what are the vulnerable aspects of his game, and modifies his strategy to nullify his opponent’s strengths. Alan has gained a reputation from previous matches of winning 5 game sets and coming from behind. (No doubt the latter is a characteristic Yorkshire trait). His winning of the 3rd game 11 – 4 may perhaps be partly due to Neil losing a little concentration being 2 games up, but if this is the case it was his undoing. Alan went on the win the remaining 2 games 11 – 7 and 11 – 9. Neil tried to dig in and eliminate errors but Alan’s relentless concentration and consistency proved too much to resist.

Your reporter would like to draw a veil over the next 3 sets, all won comfortably by the Hares. John lost to Phil and Simon in 3 straight games. Terry played his remaining set against Neil and, as John had done earlier, managed to take a game from him. So John’s and Terry’s haul for the night was 1 game each. I suppose we shouldn’t be too disappointed given the quality of the team we were playing. And who knows, in the Greater Scheme of Things, these 2 games taken from the Hares may help the cause of the POPPs A team who are one of the contenders, with Hares, to win the Division and be promoted.

The last set was Alan against Phil and, by Alan’s standards, was a rather routine victory. He lost the first game (as usual!) 5 – 11 but in the process sussed out Phil’s demon serves and his quick fire aggressive block returns. The second game was very close as Alan developed his game strategy, winning 13 – 11 (after being 0 – 4 down). The next 2 games went Alan’s way 11 – 7 and 11 – 2. In the final game Phil’s frustration led him to go for too many winners, in contrast to how he had been playing throughout the evening, but to no avail.

The final outcome was a loss for POPPS B, 3 sets to 6. This may prove to be a crucial result as the struggle to avoid being bottom of the Division is just as close as the battle to be top so every set and game won could be vital.

Terry A started proceedings but never really got warmed up in his first set against Barbara Gee and lost 3-0. Peter Mc then played and beat Rob Gee by the same score, followed by John T who did the same to Josh Gee. Score 2-1 to us.

Barbara was next opponent for Peter who was dispensed with in the same manner as Terry.
Score 2-2.

Terry reversed his first score by beating Josh 3-0, but then John lost to Rob.
Score 3-3.

Peter wins in 3 against Josh. John after coming back from 2 down against Barbara and leading in the 5th falls at the final hurdle (the net in this case). Score 4-4.

However,Terry, waiting patiently at the starting gate takes on Rob, gallops away in 3 straight and wins us the match, 5 sets to 4.

After a 3-6 defeat in the last encounter with the G’s this was a most satisfactory reversal in our favour.
Although we have slipped off the top spot in the Division, we still have an outside chance of a Top 2 placing, depending of course on how other results go.

Popps A (combined ages 201!) beat Senior Citizens (combined Ages 216!!!) 9 nil.

A great way to celebrate being at the top of Div 3 (albeit having played more matches than the nearest challengers). Terry A lead the way with another flawless display of getting everything back —- an excellent example to all of us on how to win games.

Alan Wood gave us the most exciting match of the night to come back from 5-9 down in the 5th to win it 11-9 despite an unbelievable number of edges and nets which went in favour of his opponent. He proceeded to win his other 2 games as well.

Peter Mc also had 3 wins to make it a whitewash for Senior Citizens.

All in all very satisfactory considering that last year they beat us in both matches. A good measure on how our coach Alan Dickinson has improved our games in the last 12 months. Many thanks Alan.

POPPs B played Northowram G on Monday 15th February and lost 0 – 9.  Unlike the last time we played the G family team (when we won 5 – 4) they were at full strength. The POPPs team of Alan, Joan and Terry W all played well and both Alan and Joan troubled the scorer by winning a game each. Terry came close a couple of times with games setting at 10 but couldn’t get the edge or net shot required to actually win a game. He probably produced the most spectacular winners during the evening but these were far outnumbered by spectacular misses and errors. In one game 2 attempted smashes hit Barbara G on the head twice and one got the score between the eyes. Joan and Alan played with a good deal more patience and continue to improve.